
Most solo creators I know spend $50–150/month on AI subscriptions. A writing tool here, an image generator there, a research assistant on top. It adds up fast, and most of it overlaps.
I spend $20. Two subscriptions. Over 500 articles published, 700,000+ cumulative views, and active sponsorship deals — all running on a stack that costs less than a single dinner out.
Here's the exact breakdown.
The Stack

Claude Pro — $20/month. This is the engine. Writing, coding, research, strategy, content planning, sponsor outreach drafts — Claude handles roughly 80% of everything I produce. I write in both Japanese and English, and Claude is the only model I've found that handles bilingual content work without constant babysitting.
Perplexity Pro — $0/month (free tier). I use Perplexity exclusively for fact-checking and source gathering. When I need to verify a claim, find a primary source, or survey what's been published on a topic, Perplexity's citation-first interface is faster than manual search. The free tier covers everything I need.
That's it. No ChatGPT Plus, no Midjourney, no Jasper, no copy.ai. Two tools, one paid.
What I Cancelled and Why
I've tried most of the popular options. ChatGPT Plus was the first to go — once Claude could handle long-form writing and code in a single conversation, paying for both made no sense. I ran HIX AI for a sponsored review and kept it for a month afterward; the SEO features were decent, but they duplicated what I could already do with Claude plus a free keyword tool. (I wrote about that decision in detail in my HIX AI review.)
The decision rule I settled on: if one tool covers 80% of a use case, I don't pay for a second tool to cover the remaining 20%. That remaining 20% either gets handled by a free tier elsewhere, or I simply skip it.
This sounds obvious, but most creators don't audit their stack this way. They subscribe to tools for specific features — "this one has a better image generator," "that one has better templates" — without noticing the core capabilities overlap almost entirely.
The Free-Tier Trick: Chinese LLMs as a Second Layer

Here's where it gets interesting. For tasks where I don't need Claude's full reasoning — reformatting text, generating metadata, translating short passages, bulk summarization — I route those to Chinese LLMs through their free API tiers.
GLM-5.1, MiniMax, and Kimi all offer generous free API access. I use Claude Code as the harness and swap in these models for the heavy, repetitive work. The result is a two-layer system: Claude handles anything that requires judgment, nuance, or complex reasoning; the free Chinese models handle the mechanical throughput.
I wrote about this workflow in detail in my piece on cutting Claude Code API costs by 60%. The key insight is that most "AI tasks" in a content workflow don't actually need a frontier model. They need a competent model that's free.
Monthly Revenue vs. Cost

I won't share exact sponsor revenue, but here's the math that matters: my AI tooling cost is $20/month. My sponsor deals range from $35 to $200 per article, with my pricing structure going up to $1,500 for premium packages. Even a single $200 deal per month gives me a 10x return on my entire AI infrastructure.
The real leverage, though, is time. Before consolidating to this stack, I spent roughly 2–3 hours per week managing, switching between, and learning different AI tools. That's 8–12 hours/month of overhead that now goes directly into producing content.
The Takeaway
If you're spending more than $20/month on AI tools, you're probably paying for overlap. Audit your stack with one question: does this tool do something my primary tool genuinely cannot?
If the answer is "it does it slightly better" or "it has a nicer UI for this one thing" — that's not worth a subscription. That's a preference dressed up as a need.
One good model. One free research tool. Free API tiers for the mechanical work. That's the stack.
Related
- The $0 AI Stack: 500+ Articles on Free-Tier APIs in 2026
- Single-Model Content Pipeline: 3 Months Running Claude-Only
- 5 Chinese AI Tools That Cut My API Bill by $200/Month in 2026
Tools Mentioned
Affiliate disclosure: some links below are referral or affiliate links. If you buy through them, this site may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Recommendations stay based on practical fit, not payout.
Recommended writing workflow tool
If your bottleneck is turning rough notes into publishable drafts, Typeless is worth testing. It fits best when you already have ideas and need cleaner first drafts, faster editing, or repeatable writing workflows.
WordPress hosting stack
For a Japanese WordPress site where speed, SSL, and simple server management matter more than tinkering, ConoHa WING is the hosting setup I keep coming back to.
Work with me
I write honest reviews of AI tools for builders and solo developers. Sponsorships from $200 per article; negative findings are never removed. See the sponsor page or reach out directly.


コメント
[…] $20/Month AI Stack: How I Run a 700K-View Content Business in 2026 […]
[…] $20/Month AI Stack: How I Run a 700K-View Content Business in 2026 […]
[…] $20/Month AI Stack: How I Run a 700K-View Content Business in 2026 […]
[…] $20/Month AI Stack: How I Run a 700K-View Content Business in 2026 […]